I Was Sleep Driving My Lord…

SURELY TOM QUEALLY SHOULD PUBLICLY AGREE NEVER TO OWN A CAR AND SURRENDER HIS LICENSE FOR LIFE….

Frankel

Frankel ridden by To Queally…

Sometimes you read a news story and you are lost for words. Here is the story from the Sportinglife.com

Tom Queally was today banned from driving for 22 months after claiming he was sleep walking while drink driving.

Queally was more than twice over the limit after being found asleep behind the wheel of his BMW, claimed he had not been drinking, then “rolled” out of a police car and lay down on the ground after being arrested, Crewe Magistrates’ Court heard.

But his lawyer Nick Freeman, known as “Mr Loophole” claimed the 30-year-old, most famous for being the regular jockey of Frankel, was “morally totally innocent” as he was “sleep driving” at the time and claimed the law needed to be changed.

Celebrity lawyer Mr Freeman claimed Queally was forced to admit the charge of drink driving because the law had not caught up with medical science in recognising sleep walking as a legal defence for drink driving.

Queally, from Dungarvan, Ireland, but now living at Oak Lodge, Newmarket, today admitted drink driving on March 16, earlier this year.

Kate Marchup, prosecuting, told the court around 5am on March 16 a man driving home from nightshift spotted Queally “either asleep or looking down at his mobile phone” with his car parked in the carriageway of Knutsford Road in Knutsford, Cheshire.

He was “concerned” drove back and saw another vehicle parked behind Queally’s BMW and a young man asking the defendant if he had been drinking – then the defendant drove off, but his registration number was taken.

Queally’s BMW was then spotted parked up on the forecourt of a Shell garage in the village of Chelford, nearly five miles away.

At 5.40am an officer arrived and found Queally asleep at the wheel with the car lights on and the engine running.

He gave a positive breath test and was arrested.

Queally gave a reading of 84 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath. The legal limit is 35mg.

Mr Freeman, mitigating, said a number of “trigger events” prompted an episode of sleep walking that led Queally, a man of no previous convictions and “exemplary character”, to get in the car.

He said Queally used to ride for Sir Henry Cecil, who died in June 2013. An ex-girlfriend had also committed suicide and he had suffered the break-up of a long-term relationship.

On the night of the incident he enjoyed an evening out in Hale, Cheshire with his friend and manager Nicholas Whittle and his “last recollection” was reading Hare and Hounds on a bed at Mr Whittle’s house around 2am.

Mr Freeman told the court: “The thrust of my mitigation is he’s completely unaware of what he’s doing. He’s sleep driving.

“The defendant’s next recollection is actually being in the back of a police vehicle.”

Mr Freeman said there was a history of sleep walking in Queally’s family – and the defendant had sleep walked from the age of five.

But he had never “sleep driven” before, which happened due to these “trigger events”.

Mr Freeman said the law did not allow him to argue “special reasons”, but if it did, the defendant would have pleaded not guilty on the basis of sleep walking while drink driving.

He said: “I don’t think the law has kept up with scientific developments, because it seems simply unfair for a man of this quality now to have a criminal conviction for something which in my view, he’s morally totally innocent.

“It would seem to fly in the face of natural justice.”

Dr Irshad Ebrahim, a consultant psychiatrist called by the defence to give evidence, told the court he had twice examined the defendant.

Dr Ebrahim said it was possible Queally was unaware of his actions because of his sleep walking.

“It is an automatic state, like a trance state, where there’s no control of it,” he said.

After listening to the defence mitigation, District Judge Bridget Knight said previous legal authorities had ruled sleep walking was not a defence for drink driving.

She added: “The law is quite clear, you would be deemed to be driving in such circumstances even if affected by some sleep disorder.”

Judge Knight disqualified Queally for 22 months, fined him #1,350, with a victim surcharge of #120 and ordered he pay the prosecution costs of #3,500.

Queally told the court he will pay within seven days.

Outside court Mr Freeman said: “Because drink driving is a crime that doesn’t require any specific intent, he can’t argue this as a defence or a special reason.

“The law needs to be changed to reflect this unique set of circumstances.”

So let’s get this straight…

  • Tom Queally gets arrested for drunk driving
  • Two and a half times the drink drive limit
  • In his defence, Mr Loophole told the court Mr Queally said he was unaware of his actions, as he was sleep driving!
  • Therefore this could happen again…

I wonder if the magistrate was wondering if they thought he fell off last year’s Christmas Tree! It sounds a rather far fetched excuse for being caught drunk in charge of a motor vehicle.

However, we have no reason to doubt Mr Queally’s version of events that he was sleep driving (whilst drunk), after all he had medical professionals backing up this hypothesis.  So surely it is not a question of him being let off for it, indeed in accepting this version of events Mr Queally should morally surrender his license voluntarily not for 22 months but forever!

Imagine how he would feel if at sometime in the future he got behind the wheel of a car, alseep, and caused serious injury or worse to an innocent person or god forbid a child. Asleep AND drunk, my god this doesn’t bear thinking about!

Surely there is now a moral responsibility for Tom Queally to voluntarily surrender his licence for life, it strikes me as very lucky that no one was killed. So he was not only drunk, he was also asleep! I would be worried for my own safety, never mind the public! It is bad luck that it happened after a skin full and lucky he was able to identify the problem!

This can not happen again! Mr Queallly would not be able to live with himself, surely, if he was to do it again and kill someone!  Come on Tom do the right thing and publicly agree never to drive again or have a car so you will not end up killing someone, including yourself!

WILL TOM QUEALLY NOW DO THE RIGHT THING?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone
Simple Share Buttons
Simple Share Buttons